|
911 In Plane Site: Directors Cut
Video & Photographic evidence of the largest cover-up in modern history
(Includes Frame-By-Frame Computer-Aided Video Analysis)
Why were America and the world never shown the video and photographs of
the Pentagon, BEFORE the outer wall had collapsed showing only one 16
ft. hole. Many people do not realize that the outer wall did not
collapse until almost 30 minutes after the initial impact. These
astonishing photographs and video footage speak for themselves.
Given that the outer wall of the Pentagon had not yet collapsed and the
only hole is approximately 16 ft. in diameter - how does a plane over
44 feet tall and 125 ft. wide fit into that hole as shown in the
crystal-clear and close-up photographic evidence from the Pentagon?
Furthermore, can physics explain why there is no damage to the
Pentagons upper floors where the tail section would have hit?
Close-ups of this section are extremely revealing.
“I heard a very loud, quick whooshing sound. I was convinced it was a
missile. It came in so fast – it sounded nothing like an airplane.”
Lon Rains - editor for Space News (Pentagon eyewitness)
In the aftermath, it was reported by media sources that a giant
100 ft. crater was plowed into the front lawn of the Pentagon as the
result of a powerful airliner crash? Why does photographic evidence
overwhelmingly show that this was absolutely not the case? Why no
crater? Why no skid marks? Why no burn marks? Why was the entire world
deliberately mislead? Examine the video and photographic evidence for
yourself.
How does a Boeing 757, constructed from light...... aluminum,
penetrate over 9 ft. of steel reinforced concrete? Photographs and
recently discovered computer animations help shed light on this unexplained feat of physics.
Contrary to the pictures shown to the American public, after the
fact, why does photographic evidence taken only a few moments after the
Pentagon event show no wreckage on the lawn of the Pentagon? Where is
the plane? Where is the tail, the wings, the luggage, the seats, the
landing gear; the engines? What happened to the passengers?
At the World Trade Center, why did firefighters, reporters and
other on the scene eyewitnesses describe a demolition-like, pancake
collapse of buildings One, Two & Seven? Hear the outrageous
admissions made by the building lease owner recorded on video, plus
shocking new video evidence helps to answer some of these important questions.
What is the bright flash on the right side of the Boeing 767, seen
just before impact on both the North Tower & the South Tower,
captured on video by 5 separate cameramen including CNN and ABC? Slow
motion analysis reveals startling verification of this extraordinary
event and begs the question, "What is it?" Find out what former
military personnel think this could be.
Why were there numerous reports of bombs & explosions going
off in and around the WTC before any buildings had collapsed? Hear
& see the testimony of the reporters, rescue teams and eyewitnesses
who tell a different story of potential demolition charges, unexplained
explosions, and vehicles loaded with explosives as reported on live
television the morning of Sept. 11, 2001.
Why did a FOX News employee, who witnessed the second tower
attack, report seeing no windows on “Flight 175” a commercial United
Airlines jetliner? Why did another eyewitness report that United
Airlines Flight 175 was not a commercial airliner? What kind of plane
hit the second tower?
Is there some type of exterior swelling protruding from the
undercarriage of “Flight 175” ? An independently conducted computerized
digital analysis says yes. Where was this "instrument" attached? How
could it have departed from a commercial airport without being noticed?
What purpose did it serve in the attacks? Full-screen television
blow-ups directly from CNN and other mainstream sources reveal the
intricate details of this strange anomaly.
|
